home page

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Oscar Talk 2008/09 - Werner Herzog v Ellen Kuras BODYSLAM!!
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 19, 20, 21  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.     Forum Index -> Film
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Smithie
Site Admin


Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 12640

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:21 pm    Post subject: Oscar Talk 2008/09 - Werner Herzog v Ellen Kuras BODYSLAM!! Reply with quote

I just wanted to get the thread refreshed. I'm open to ideas on the title.
_________________


Last edited by Smithie on Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jonny
Site Admin


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 12772
Location: los angeles, ca

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i don't know about a title. but blanche? please explain yourself:

Quote:
blanchardwasrobbed wrote:
I absolutely loathe these nominees. First off, if this damn song list is correct, I told you so. I knew they would nominate what is essentially a fucking DANCE song with hardly any words from Slumdog because of the film's title alone.


okay, i'm with you so far (though i disagree... but then:

Quote:
blanchardwasrobbed wrote:
I have seen all of the picture, director, adapted screenplay, song, and editing nominees. If I were picking winners?

Picture: Milk
Director: Fincher
Adapted Screenplay: Doubt
Editing: Milk
Song: "Jaiho"


wha?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
jonny
Site Admin


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 12772
Location: los angeles, ca

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

and although some want to think that everyone watches on the tv anxiously awaiting their name, i imagine some of these people actively avoid it as to not jinx themselves or some other superstition like that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Above the Title
Site Admin


Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 11505
Location: The cast party

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To continue with the Best Song discussion (because it's always nice to step away from Best Actress for a nanosecond), I would urge you, jeng, to stay for the whole song when you get to see the film. In a way I thought it actually made the ending more finite. It seemed to be an extension of the plot and specifically Rourke's character. I think that is what's so frustrating about the snub. They make it this big point to analyze what the song adds to the story and, in this particular case, even though it was over the credits, it didn't feel like they called up Springsteen three weeks before it was set to open and asked him to pen something to get an extra Oscar nomination. This is not even to say it deserved to get in over the three nominees, which are pretty deserving in their own right. I just thought there was enough out there to have a five song category this year.

And, no, I don't think it's too hyperbolic to call the lyrics prolific. Maybe when they're out of context but I honestly thought they captured the character so well. And, really, it's the Boss so it's not like the praise for his skills is unwarranted in any respect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Mahogany Soul



Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 11032

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also, now that I've realized it's 5:30 there and not 8:30 like where I am, I don't blame them for being sleep. I wish somebody would call me that early. It better be to tell me I won.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Above the Title
Site Admin


Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 11505
Location: The cast party

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Every time we discuss whether people are awake and watching TV or not, I think of Evan Rachel Wood throwing a slumber party for herself and then not hearing her name announced.

Also, to shift back to the noms themselves, I said that I thought Best Actor was particularly strong this year. I'd say 2002 was also incredibly strong (Brody, Nicholson, Day-Lewis, Cage and Cane) as was 2006 (Hoffman, Ledger, Straithairn, Phoenix and Howard). The weakest year for Best Actor this decade was definitely 2001 (Washington, Crowe, Wilkinson, Smith and Penn). For Best Actress, my favorite year of the decade was definitely 2005 (Swank, Staunton, Winslet, Bening and Moreno). The weakest year was 2006 (Witherspoon, Huffman, Dench, Knightley and Theron). For Best Supporting Actress, my favorite year was 2005 (Blanchett, Portman, Madsen, Okonedo and Linney) and my least favorite was 2002 (Zellweger, Aghdashloo, Hunter, Clarkson and Harden). Not surprisingly, I couldn't find a Best Supporting Actor category I particularly cared for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
diplomatic machine gun



Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 2500

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the title of the thread, I nominate "The Skanks in the Back of the Class." Why? Because of this awesome blurb by Dana Stevens, Slate magazine's film critic, in her article this morning:

Quote:
Gossiping about Oscar nominations during this historic inauguration week feels sort of like being one of the skanks passing notes in the back of the junior-high classroom while the star civics student gives a prizewinning oration. But you know what? He's going to be up there talking for four years, and Oscar season only lasts for one brief, sparkling, tawdry moment. So let's hide a movie magazine in our civics textbooks and skank out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Misplaced Validity



Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 10860

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Above the Title wrote:
To continue with the Best Song discussion (because it's always nice to step away from Best Actress for a nanosecond), I would urge you, jeng, to stay for the whole song when you get to see the film. In a way I thought it actually made the ending more finite. It seemed to be an extension of the plot and specifically Rourke's character. I think that is what's so frustrating about the snub. They make it this big point to analyze what the song adds to the story and, in this particular case, even though it was over the credits, it didn't feel like they called up Springsteen three weeks before it was set to open and asked him to pen something to get an extra Oscar nomination. This is not even to say it deserved to get in over the three nominees, which are pretty deserving in their own right. I just thought there was enough out there to have a five song category this year.

And, no, I don't think it's too hyperbolic to call the lyrics prolific. Maybe when they're out of context but I honestly thought they captured the character so well. And, really, it's the Boss so it's not like the praise for his skills is unwarranted in any respect.

I plan on seeing the movie whenever it makes it here, and even with just a vague notion of the film I can see the song being an effective mood piece. So, to that extent, and as I said before, I wouldn't begrudge it an Oscar. It's just that if I were to have simply been given the lyrics/melody with no context, vocal, etc. I wouldn't find it very enlightening. In fact, I'd say it was overly dramatic. But since you all have convinced me the category is as much about how a song is used in/for the film, I could definitely see it deserving recognition. Bruce and the production really flesh the song out, and I am sure it works well with Rourke's character.

And besides all of that, few songs these days impress me lyrically, anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Misplaced Validity



Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 10860

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

diplomatic machine gun wrote:
For the title of the thread, I nominate "The Skanks in the Back of the Class." Why? Because of this awesome blurb by Dana Stevens, Slate magazine's film critic, in her article this morning:

Quote:
Gossiping about Oscar nominations during this historic inauguration week feels sort of like being one of the skanks passing notes in the back of the junior-high classroom while the star civics student gives a prizewinning oration. But you know what? He's going to be up there talking for four years, and Oscar season only lasts for one brief, sparkling, tawdry moment. So let's hide a movie magazine in our civics textbooks and skank out.

Ha! Hell, even "Skank Out" would be a nice title.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Smithie
Site Admin


Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 12640

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good one, diplo, but I came up with my own. Smile
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bradcar77



Joined: 28 Sep 2005
Posts: 11365

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Man... I was going to suggest "Will Winless Winslet Win One?" but since the last title was Kate based and the topic has been discussed to death, so probably not the best choice. But it had alliteration and sort of a tongue twister too!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Smithie
Site Admin


Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 12640

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's a good one though. You should post it on a Variety blog (if there are any, I don't know) and see if it winds up in their Awards issue.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deet



Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 13972

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you think Herzog will show up? I mean, probably not, right? Unless Joaquin Phoenix is trapped under a car or something?

Then again, I'd love, FUCKING LOVE, it if Joaquin Phoenix just showed up looking the way he currently does.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
malcolm1980



Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 4124
Location: Makati City, Philippines

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Above the Title wrote:
Every time we discuss whether people are awake and watching TV or not, I think of Evan Rachel Wood throwing a slumber party for herself and then not hearing her name announced.



During the year of Jaws, Steven Spielberg let a camera crew into his house as he watched the nomination announcements on TV only to see himself get snubbed in favor of Federico Fellini. ("They chose Fellini over me!")

Michael Clarke Duncan also let a camera crew into his hotel room, house, whatever as he watched the nominations. When he heard his name called he did a Cuba Gooding Jr. and yelled and jumped around ("YEAH!!! I AM IN THERE!!! I'M IN THERE!"). I remember the footage being shown on Leno. I don't know if anyone has the clip.

I'd like to bring up another piece of discussion: Can anyone conceivably beat Heath Ledger?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Deet



Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 13972

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember Michael Chiklis letting a crew watch him watch the nominations. He got in. But, hell no. There's no way, I'm going to A) admit that I want it that bad (I would, I'm not even gonna pretend) and B) what if I don't get it? On national television. Plus, C) it's just sorta tacky.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big Ted



Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 16157

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Following Rachel's lead...

Best "Best Actor" Lineup: 2002 (Brody, Caine, Cage, Day-Lewis, Nicholson)
Worst "Best Actor" Lineup: 2006 (DiCaprio, Gosling, O'Toole, Smith, Whitaker)


Best "Best Actress" Lineup: 2006 (Cruz, Dench, Mirren, Streep, Winslet)
Worst "Best Actress" Lineup: 2005 (Dench, Huffman, Knightley, Theron, Witherspoon)


Best "Best Supporting Actor" Lineup: 2000 (Bridges, Dafoe, del Toro, Finney, Phoenix), although 2004 was good too (Alda, Church, Foxx, Freeman, Owen)
Worst "Best Supporting Actor" Lineup: 2005 (Clooney, Dillon, Giamatti, Gyllenhaal, Hurt)


Best "Best Supporting Actress" Lineup: 2001 (Connelly, Mirren, Smith, Tomei, Winslet)
Worst "Best Supporting Actress" Lineup: 2002 (Bates, Moore, Latifah, Streep, Zeta-Jones)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Big Ted



Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 16157

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deet wrote:
I remember Michael Chiklis letting a crew watch him watch the nominations. He got in. But, hell no. There's no way, I'm going to A) admit that I want it that bad (I would, I'm not even gonna pretend) and B) what if I don't get it? On national television. Plus, C) it's just sorta tacky.


I remember that too. First time I saw it, I thought it was cute, but they kept playing it everywhere to death until the the night of the Emmys (they played it on the red carpet too).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Big Ted



Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 16157

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

malcolm1980 wrote:
I'd like to bring up another piece of discussion: Can anyone conceivably beat Heath Ledger?


Honestly, I thought the only ones who could upset him were Robert Downey Jr. (but he needed the Globe) or Dev Patel (who got snubbed, but had he been nodded, who knows who crazy the Slumfans would have been when they started checking things off).

So, not anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
bradcar77



Joined: 28 Sep 2005
Posts: 11365

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deet wrote:
Do you think Herzog will show up? I mean, probably not, right? Unless Joaquin Phoenix is trapped under a car or something?

Then again, I'd love, FUCKING LOVE, it if Joaquin Phoenix just showed up looking the way he currently does.



But to complete the ensemble, he should have either "Bye! Good" on his shirt or pull a Macy Gray and have "My Album Drops On ____" written on there. Preferably using a Bedazzler
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mahogany Soul



Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 11032

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

His hat is so the next big thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dug11



Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 11139

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deet



Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 13972

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It looks like a pair of totally fubar'd underwear.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mista Q



Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 1563
Location: Champaign, IL

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Following Ted and Rachel's lead...

Best "Best Actor" Lineup: 2002 (Brody, Cage, Caine, Day-Lewis, Nicholson)
Worst "Best Actor" Lineup: 2004 (Cheadle, Depp, DiCaprio, Eastwood, Foxx)


Best "Best Actress" Lineup: 2006 (Cruz, Dench, Mirren, Streep, Winslet)
Worst "Best Actress" Lineup: 2007 (Blanchett, Christie, Cotillard, Linney, Page)


Best "Best Supporting Actor" Lineup: 2002 (Cooper, Harris, Newman, Reilly, Walken)
Worst "Best Supporting Actor" Lineup: 2005 (Clooney, Dillon, Giamatti, Gyllenhaal, Hurt)


Best "Best Supporting Actress" Lineup: 2008 (Adams, Cruz, Davis, Henson, Tomei)
Worst "Best Supporting Actress" Lineup: 2006 (Barraza, Blanchett, Breslin, Hudson, Kikuchi)
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
malcolm1980



Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 4124
Location: Makati City, Philippines

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just found out Martin McDonagh is actually an Oscar-winner already. He won a couple of years ago for Best Short Live-Action Short (Six-Shooter).

Which brings me to the question, how many people who have been nominated or won in the Short Film categories go on to bigger, better things? It seems to me for most of them, their respective wins/nominations in these categories is the most high-profile point in their respective film caeers.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Raybee



Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 3034

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm just so happy the Academy righted the Winslet in supporting thing. And she is now officially tied with Deborah Kerr and Thelma Ritter as the biggest losers amongst females. All have 6 nominations and no wins. That should be remedied next month though. I don't see her losing unless she pulls a Russell Crowe at the BAFTAs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.     Forum Index -> Film All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 19, 20, 21  Next
Page 1 of 21

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group